Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet

Received: 17 October 2022     Accepted: 3 January 2023     Published: 17 January 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Public health is facing new types of global challenges coming from the risks all classes of population get exposed to via their growing use of Internet based media and contents. As the individualized treatment of such health and social problems is both difficult and very costly, preventive and legislative measures have been taken in a vast number of countries. Excessive internet use has not yet been recognised as a disorder by the World Health Organization (WHO), nor in the American Psychiatric Association’s list of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); however, the related diagnosis of online gaming disorder (6C50) and online gaming disorder (6C51) have been included in the forthcoming 11th revision of WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This paper is focussing on top-down laws voted in a Parliament, or enacted public regulations and some industry wide regulations, which, in different countries, tackle one or several facets of Internet addiction or problematic uses of the Internet (PUI). This international survey is carried out on a basis of laws and regulations in each country, with Internet addiction or PUI as a direct or indirect scope. This has resulted early 2020 in the identification and summarization of a catalogue of 66 laws or regulations from 50 countries, each described in template form in a supplementary document. The identified laws and regulations are analysed with respect to specific consequences of the Internet addictions, as well as by categories of stakeholders addressed in these measures. The laws and regulations are also classified in terms of the underlying principles and solution approaches, showing large cultural differences.

Published in World Journal of Public Health (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12
Page(s) 8-14
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Internet Addiction, Problematic Usage of the Internet, Laws, Regulations, Mental Disorders

References
[1] Shaw M. and Black DW (2008). Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs. 22 (5): 353-65. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822050-00001. PMID: 18399706.
[2] Pau L-F (2020). Internet addictions and problematic use of the Internet: terminology and causalities. Research report under publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337482360_INTERNET_ADDICTIONS_and_PROBLEMATIC_USE_OF_THE_INTERNET_TERMINOLOGY_AND_CAUSALITIES
[3] Chou C., Condron L., & Belland J. C. (2005). A Review of the Research on Internet Addiction. Educational Psychology Review. 17 (4): 363–388. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-8138-1. ISSN 1040-726X.
[4] American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2012). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), 5 th edition. https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[5] Martinez G. (2019). Apps to prevent suicides. CTXT (Contexto y accion) www.ctxt.es, 28/12/2019. Reported as: Des applis pour prévenir les suicides, Courrier International, no 1526 (30/1/2020): 37.
[6] Rosenblatt B. (1999). Principles of jurisdiction in the Internet. https://cyber.harvard.edu/property99/domain/Betsy.html.
[7] United Nations (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child (Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989, entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49). https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
[8] Byun S., Ruffini C., Mills J. E., Douglas Alecia C., Niang M., Stepchenkova S., Lee Seul K., Loutfi J. & Lee Jung-Kook (2008). Internet Addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 Quantitative Research. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour. 12 (2): 203–207. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0102. ISSN 1094-9313. PMID 19072075
[9] Griffiths M. D. Internet Addiction: Does it really exist? In: J. Gackenbach (Ed.): Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Applications. Academic Press: New York. 61-75.
[10] Swiss Institute of Comparative Law (2015). Avis 14-067: Comparative study in respect of filtering, blocking and take-down of illegal content on the internet in the 47 member states of the Council of Europe. (2015-12-20) https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/study-filtering-blocking-and-take-down-of-illegal-content-on-the-internet (accessed 09.02.2020).
[11] Scott C. (2018). The changing face of Problematic Internet use: and interpersonal approach. Peter Lang Publ.: New York. ISBN: 978-1-4331-5099-9. doi: 10.3726/b12612
[12] Kandell J. J. (1998). Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour. 1 (1): 11–17. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.11. ISSN 1094-9313.
[13] PsycNET” (2018). http://psycnet.apa.org. Accessed 2018-02-21.
[14] Council of Europe (2012). Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (CETS No. 201). Also nicknamed: “Lanzarote Convention”. Entry into force 01.07.2010. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/201
[15] Lewis P. (2017). Our minds can be hijacked': the tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia. The Guardian. 06/10/2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia
[16] Council of Europe (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185). Also nicknamed « Budapest convention”. Entry into force 01/07/2004. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185/signatures
[17] United Nations (2000). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (A/RES/54/263). Entry into force: 18/01/2002 in accordance with article 14 (1). United Nations, Treaty Series. 2171: 227.
[18] Wikipedia (2020). Reservations and territorial application on UN Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography. Accessed 19/02/2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optional_Protocol_on_the_Sale_of_Children,_Child_Prostitution_and_Child_Pornography#Reservations_and_territorial_application
[19] Young K. (1998). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour. 1 (3): 237–244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237. ISSN 1094-9313
[20] WHO (2017). Diagnostic classification system, ICD-11 Version. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/timeline/en/ and https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/1448597234
[21] Kiraly O., Griffiths M. D., King D. L., Lee H. K., Lee S. Y., Banyai F., Zsila, A., Takacs Z. K. & Demetrovics Z. (2017). Policy responses to problematic video game use: a systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. J. Behav. Addict. 7 (3): 1-15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426392/.
[22] Edick D. A. (1998-01-08). Regulation of pornography on the Internet in the United States and the United Kingdom: a comparative analysis. Boston College International and Comparative Law review. 21 (2): 4-. https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1243&context=iclr.
[23] Better Internet for Kids (2020). https://www.betterinternetforkids.eu/. Accessed 23/02/2020.
[24] Safer Internet Days (2020). https://www.saferinternetday.org/. Accessed 23/02/2020.
[25] BARTOC (2020). Thesaurus of sociological indexing terms. Basel Register of thesauri, ontologies & classifications. www.bartoc.org. Results for “Internet addiction”: http://data.ub.uio.no/humord/c33603; http://crai.ub.edu/thub/concept/a12471793; http://vocabulaires.irstea.fr/thesaurus/THS00009426; http://www.yso.fi/onto/juho/p13947; http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25639; http://www.yso.fi/onto/koko/p59037
[26] San G., Handbook of research on children’s consumption of digital media. IGI Global: Hershey, PA. ISBN: 9781522557333. 423 p.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Pau, L., Kirtava, Z. (2023). International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet. World Journal of Public Health, 8(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Pau, L.; Kirtava, Z. International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet. World J. Public Health 2023, 8(1), 8-14. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Pau L, Kirtava Z. International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet. World J Public Health. 2023;8(1):8-14. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12,
      author = {Louis-François Pau and Zviad Kirtava},
      title = {International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet},
      journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {8-14},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20230801.12},
      abstract = {Public health is facing new types of global challenges coming from the risks all classes of population get exposed to via their growing use of Internet based media and contents. As the individualized treatment of such health and social problems is both difficult and very costly, preventive and legislative measures have been taken in a vast number of countries. Excessive internet use has not yet been recognised as a disorder by the World Health Organization (WHO), nor in the American Psychiatric Association’s list of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); however, the related diagnosis of online gaming disorder (6C50) and online gaming disorder (6C51) have been included in the forthcoming 11th revision of WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This paper is focussing on top-down laws voted in a Parliament, or enacted public regulations and some industry wide regulations, which, in different countries, tackle one or several facets of Internet addiction or problematic uses of the Internet (PUI). This international survey is carried out on a basis of laws and regulations in each country, with Internet addiction or PUI as a direct or indirect scope. This has resulted early 2020 in the identification and summarization of a catalogue of 66 laws or regulations from 50 countries, each described in template form in a supplementary document. The identified laws and regulations are analysed with respect to specific consequences of the Internet addictions, as well as by categories of stakeholders addressed in these measures. The laws and regulations are also classified in terms of the underlying principles and solution approaches, showing large cultural differences.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - International Survey & Analysis of Laws and Regulations Addressing Internet Addiction and/or Problematic Usage of the Internet
    AU  - Louis-François Pau
    AU  - Zviad Kirtava
    Y1  - 2023/01/17
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12
    T2  - World Journal of Public Health
    JF  - World Journal of Public Health
    JO  - World Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 8
    EP  - 14
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-6059
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.12
    AB  - Public health is facing new types of global challenges coming from the risks all classes of population get exposed to via their growing use of Internet based media and contents. As the individualized treatment of such health and social problems is both difficult and very costly, preventive and legislative measures have been taken in a vast number of countries. Excessive internet use has not yet been recognised as a disorder by the World Health Organization (WHO), nor in the American Psychiatric Association’s list of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); however, the related diagnosis of online gaming disorder (6C50) and online gaming disorder (6C51) have been included in the forthcoming 11th revision of WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This paper is focussing on top-down laws voted in a Parliament, or enacted public regulations and some industry wide regulations, which, in different countries, tackle one or several facets of Internet addiction or problematic uses of the Internet (PUI). This international survey is carried out on a basis of laws and regulations in each country, with Internet addiction or PUI as a direct or indirect scope. This has resulted early 2020 in the identification and summarization of a catalogue of 66 laws or regulations from 50 countries, each described in template form in a supplementary document. The identified laws and regulations are analysed with respect to specific consequences of the Internet addictions, as well as by categories of stakeholders addressed in these measures. The laws and regulations are also classified in terms of the underlying principles and solution approaches, showing large cultural differences.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark; Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Upgötva AB, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Caucasus School of Medicine and Healthcare Management, Tbilisi, Georgia; Geocase Think Tank, Tbilisi, Georgia

  • Sections